[Gelistirici] Fwd: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun

[Ismail Dönmez]

On Friday 18 May 2007 14:20:56 S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> XFS için şu nobarrier'i öntnaımlı olmaktan çıkartsak?
>
> ----------  Yönlendirilmiş İleti  ----------
>
> Subject: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun
> Date: 18 May 2007 Cum
> From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen at sandeen.net>
> To: Jeff Garzik <jeff at garzik.org>
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> On May 16 2007 10:42, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>> For example, I'll pick on xfs for a minute.  compilebench shows the
> >>> default FS you get from mkfs.xfs is pretty slow for untarring a bunch
> >>> of kernel trees.
> >>
> >> I suppose you used 'nobarrier'? [ http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/19/33 ]
> >
> > Shouldn't that option be renamed to 'corrupt_my_data'?  ;-)
>
> It means "I have real storage with battery backed cache and I'd like
> good performance, please"

Eh ben elime aldım XFS'i nobarrier ile dedim inanmadınız :P



-- 
Perfect is the enemy of good
-------------- sonraki bölüm --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kullanılamıyor
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://liste.pardus.org.tr/gelistirici/attachments/20070519/29279bc9/attachment-0002.pgp>