[Gelistirici] Fwd: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun

[S.Çağlar Onur]

XFS için şu nobarrier'i öntnaımlı olmaktan çıkartsak?

----------  Yönlendirilmiş İleti  ----------

Subject: Re: filesystem benchmarking fun
Date: 18 May 2007 Cum
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen at sandeen.net>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff at garzik.org>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On May 16 2007 10:42, Chris Mason wrote:
>>> For example, I'll pick on xfs for a minute.  compilebench shows the
>>> default FS you get from mkfs.xfs is pretty slow for untarring a bunch of
>>> kernel trees.
>>
>> I suppose you used 'nobarrier'? [ http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/19/33 ]
> 
> Shouldn't that option be renamed to 'corrupt_my_data'?  ;-)

It means "I have real storage with battery backed cache and I'd like 
good performance, please"

-Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-------------------------------------------------------

-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar at pardus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!
-------------- sonraki bölüm --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kullanılamıyor
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://liste.pardus.org.tr/gelistirici/attachments/20070518/c861d9a2/attachment-0002.pgp>