[dernek] [DW] News - Open Source in Government (fwd)

---------

From: Mustafa Akgul (akgul@Bilkent.EDU.TR)
Date: Fri 07 Nov 2003 - 03:27:57 EST

  • Next message: Onur Kucuk: "[dernek] Izmirli Linuxcularin Ilk Toplantisi"

    From: Steven Clift <clift@publicus.net>
    Subject: [DW] News - Open Source in Government

    *** Democracies Online Newswire - http://e-democracy.org/do ***
    *** See something? Send submissions to: clift@publicus.net ***

    If you are a techie who works in government, non-profits, etc. and
    are interested in trading notes on these issues (pro/con open source
    welcome), send an e-mail to: do-code-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

    Also see:

    The Center of Open Source & Government
    http://www.egovos.org

    eTen proposal "Virtual City Hall", City of Hagen
    http://www.telecities.org/details/project_detail.asp?projectID=P00102

    Open Source Software in Government
    http://www.oss.gov.za/

    GovernmentForge
    http://governmentforge.org/
    http://governmentforge.org/mt/
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/governmentforge

    Open source software: briefing to the Minister of State Serv. - March
    2003
    http://www.e-government.govt.nz/docs/open-source-200303/

    July 2002, UK Government published a new policy on the use of Open
    Source
    http://www.ogc.gov.uk/index.asp?id=2190

    More articles:
    http://news.google.com/news?q=open+source+government

    3 articles below.

    Steven Clift
    Democracies Online Newswire
    http://www.e-democracy.org/do

    P.S. If you are aware of any e-participation/e-consultation/e-
    democracy related technology projects in government, please let me
    know. Because
    e-democracy often lacks the cost-saving argument, my sense is that
    most government technology enhancements in this area will be on the
    cheap. Imagine if governments shared the costs of developing a
    shared online consultation platform, or parliaments a system for
    online committee hearings, etc..

    From:
    http://www.washingtontechnology.com/news/18_15/statelocal/22000-
    1.html

    10/27/03; Vol. 18 No. 15

    Open source riles software makers

    By WILLIAM WELSH

    Massachusetts ignites furor with new strategy
    A decision by the state of Massachusetts to shift to open-computing
    standards and consider open-source software as part of that strategy
    has many software companies concerned about their future business
    with the state.

    While open standards are on their way to becoming part of a
    mainstream government technology, the mere mention that a state would
    use open-source software has the industry in an uproar.

    Massachusetts will focus initially on open standards to increase
    interoperability of systems, upgrade legacy systems and cut costs
    before considering open-source software or systems, said Eric Kriss,
    Massachusetts' administration and finance secretary.

    "We want to put more focus on thinking about where open-source
    products can fill some of our needs. That does not mean we are
    kicking out proprietary products," Kriss told Washington Technology.

    ...

    From:
    http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS7678767201.html

    OSSI releases components to eGovernment web wervices platform
    Nov. 06, 2003

    The Open Source Software Institute (OSSI) announced the release and
    availability of the first phase of Project Leopard, the core
    component of its eGovernment web services platform based on LAMP
    (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Perl/Python). LAMP serves as a foundation
    upon which powerful and scalable web-based programs can be developed
    and implemented in an open-source environment.

    OSSI also announced the formation of the Open Government
    Interoperability Standard (OGIS) working group. The OGI Standard will
    serve as the policy guideline for modules and applications developed
    using the Leopard program Working group members include
    representatives from government, academic and corporate sectors.

    "Our mission is to promote open-source solutions within the
    government and schools," said OSSI director John Weathersby. "We've
    found that state and local government agencies are searching for
    applications that are affordable, manageable, scalable and provide
    interoperability. LAMP applications meet these needs and Leopard
    makes it easy, fast and cost effective."

    ...

    See:
    http://www.oss-institute.org/
    http://oss-institute.org/pressrelease/leopardpr1.html
    http://leopard.sourceforge.net/

    From:
    http://www.wired.com/news/ebiz/0,1272,61045,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1
    Talk:
    http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/03/11/03/182226.shtml?tid=126&tid=172

    Aussies Do It Right: E-Voting

    By Kim Zetter | Also by this reporter Page 1 of 2 next »

    02:00 AM Nov. 03, 2003 PT

    While critics in the United States grow more concerned each day about
    the insecurity of electronic voting machines, Australians designed a
    system two years ago that addressed and eased most of those concerns:
    They chose to make the software running their system completely open
    to public scrutiny.

    Although a private Australian company designed the system, it was
    based on specifications set by independent election officials, who
    posted the code on the Internet for all to see and evaluate. What's
    more, it was accomplished from concept to product in six months. It
    went through a trial run in a state election in 2001.

    Critics say the development process is a model for how electronic
    voting machines should be made in the United States.

    Called eVACS, or Electronic Voting and Counting System, the system
    was created by a company called Software Improvements to run on
    Linux, an open-source operating system available on the Internet.

    Election officials in the Australian Capital Territory, one of eight
    states and territories in the country, turned to electronic voting
    for the same reason the United States did -- a close election in 1998
    exposed errors in the state's hand-counting system. Two candidates
    were separated by only three or four votes, said Phillip Green,
    electoral commissioner for the territory. After recounting, officials
    discovered that out of 80,000 ballots, they had made about 100
    mistakes. They decided to investigate other voting methods.

    In 1999, the Australian Capital Territory Electoral Commission put
    out a public call for e-vote proposals to see if an electronic option
    was viable. Over 15 proposals came in, but only one offered an open-
    source solution. Two companies proposed the plan in partnership after
    extensive consultation with academics at Australian National
    University. But one of the companies later dropped out of the
    project, leaving Software Improvements to build the system.

    ...

    ^ ^ ^ ^
    Steven L. Clift - W: http://www.publicus.net
    Minneapolis - - - E: clift@publicus.net
    Minnesota - - - - - T: +1.612.822.8667
    USA - - - - - - M: +1.612.203.5181

    Join my Democracies Online Newswire:
        http://e-democracy.org/do
    My blogging experiment:
        http://travelscoops.com

    *** Past Messages, Discussion http://e-democracy.org/do ***
    *** To subscribe, e-mail: listserv@tc.umn.edu ***
    *** Message body: SUB DO-WIRE ***
    *** To UNSUBSCRIBE instead, write: UNSUB DO-WIRE ***
    *** Please send submissions to: clift@publicus.net ***


  • Next message: Onur Kucuk: "[dernek] Izmirli Linuxcularin Ilk Toplantisi"

    ---------

    Bu arsiv hypermail 2.1.6 tarafindan uretilmistir.