From: Ozer Tayiz (info@teknobilge.com)
Date: Mon 26 Jun 2006 - 08:23:46 GMT
Merhaba,
Sadece "ekşi sözlük" değil söz konusu olan. Ticari firmalar arasında
bile, "benim sitem onunkinden hızlı çıksın" diye, bant genişliğinin
dışında firmalardan para alınması mümkün olacak. Yahoo Google'dan
hızlı çıkmak için, B&N, Amazon'dan hızlı çıkmak için IT&T gibi
firmalara para veriyor olacak...
İçerik CNN'den geliyorsa hızlı, bağımsız bir blog'dan wikiden
geliyorsa yavaş olacak, veya tamamen engellenecek...
Yine aynı uluslararası büyük telekom şirketlerinin, birbiriyle bağı
var. TT'un da özelleştirildiğini, ve bir kısım hissesinin yabancı
ortakta olduğunu düşünürseniz, Amerika'da çıkan böyle bir yasanın,
giderek dünyanın her yerinde yansımaları olması beklenebilir.
Giderek bütün devletler, büyük şirketlerin elinde oyuncak oluyor, "muz
cumhuriyeti"ne dönüyor, globalleşmenin vahim sonucu bu.
Varın siz düşünün, bu yasa çıktıktan sonra, MS'un sourceforge.net'in
veya Redhat'in erişimini engellemek veya yavaşlatmak için
yapabileceklerini... Veya mesela Ana Brittanica'nın Wikipedia'nın
erişimini yavaşlatmak engellemek için yapabileceklerini...
Kısacası, internet üzerinden özgür iletişim hakkı alınıyor, bu
merkezileşmiş büyük medya gibi kontrol edilmek isteniyor.
Konunun özünü, aşağıdaki alıntı açıklıyor:
http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/
> Net Leaders: Discrimination Is Bad for Business
> June 25th, 2006 by tkarr
>
> Two of the Internet’s top business innovators made a case for Net
> Neutrality today in an op-ed written for the San Jose Mercury News:
>
> “Reinstating the Internet’s core principle of net neutrality won’t
> stand in the way of innovation,” write John Doerr and Reed
> Hastings. “Indeed, net neutrality has, until recently, been the
> very foundation of Internet innovation.”
>
> Top venture capitalist Doerr joined NetFlix co-founder Hastings to
> call on Congress to prevent the nation’s largest phone and cable
> companies from gutting Net Neutrality and squashing the innovation
> that has made the Internet an economic force.
>
> Phone companies have stated their intention to give favored nation
> status to their own or allied businesses’ Web sites, thereby
> slowing or, even, blocking access to rival search engines, music
> dowload sites, social networking communities, online phone
> services, or other applications. Net Neutrality would prevent this
> discrimination. The most profitable online business ideas would
> rise as a result of user preference, and not by special selection
> of the companies that control the pipes.
>
> Doer and Hastings write:
>
> “Because of the unfettered power of phone and cable companies
> to control consumer access to Internet content, we need tailored
> safeguards that prevent network operators from discriminating in
> the delivery or prioritization of content based on source or
> ownership. We are not proposing a new, heavy-handed set of
> regulations. Consumers deserve tailored safeguards that prevent
> network operators from affirmatively blocking, degrading or
> impairing consumer access to the Internet content, services and
> applications of their choice or discriminating in the delivery of
> Internet content.”
>
> Until recently, they write, Net Neutrality has ensured the
> Internet’s growth into a vibrant and non-discriminatory
> marketplace:
>
> “Today, we take for granted the convenience of the Internet.
> But we should not overlook that the basic principle of net
> neutrality has enabled the Internet innovations that produce great
> benefits for consumers and economic prosperity for our nation.”
>
> Hastings reports that it’s because of Net Neutrality that his
> Netflix grew from a small online business into one today that
> serves 5 million subscribers.
>
> Doerr and Hastings argue that other business innovations are now
> under threat by moves by the likes of AT&T and Verizon that would
> stifle the openness that has been a hallmark of the Internet:
>
> “Cable and phone companies are currently working on Capitol
> Hill to protect their ability to discriminate in the delivery or
> prioritization of Internet content based on its source or
> ownership. The giant cable and phone companies don’t want Congress
> to limit their power to discriminate against Web sites. They want
> to be able to pick and choose the Internet content that travels via
> high-speed broadband.”
>
> This discrimination defies the Internet’s stunning evolution toward
> an end-to-end system, where control resides not with middlemen but
> with those of us who go online.
>
> Under this revolutionary system, rewards go to the businesses that
> enhance our choices — not those that restrict them.
>
> Moreover, when choice is left with end users, the best businesses
> rise to the top as the result of a true and virtual free market.
> When monopoly ISPs discriminate, new economic ideas aren’t given a
> chance to compete against the status quo. Innovation is snubbed
> out. Economic growth slows to a halt.
>
> Read the op-ed.
İsterseniz, bir bireysel özgürlük savunucusu olarak, bu konuyla ilgili
bir makale yazabilir (e-dergi için), veya sunum hazırlayabilirim
(seminer-cg için).
On Monday 26 June 2006 12:17 am, Burak SU wrote:
> Cok degil bir kac hafta önce Ekşi sözlüğün erişimini Turk Telekom
> engellemişti. İstanbul Emniyet Müdürlüğünün "esrar" başlığı
> altındaki "entry"lerin özendirici olduğu gerekçesiyle açtığı dava
> sonucu Ekşi Sözlük'e girmek istediginizde "Bu siteye erişim mahkeme
> karari ile durdurulmuştur" deniliyordu.
>
> Ruek telekom bu şekilde rahat bir şekilde erişim engelleyebiliyorsa
> milyonlarca dolar para yatiran firmalar neler yapabilir merak ettim
> doğrusu?
_______________________________________________
Linux-sohbet mailing list
Linux-sohbet@liste.linux.org.tr
http://liste.linux.org.tr/mailman/listinfo/linux-sohbet