>Linux'u bir NT Domain Controller gibi kullanabilirmiyim. ???
Tabiyki.. /etc/smb.conf'a bi bakIn.. (RedHat'de tabi.. Slackware iCin
samba'yI kurduGunuzda, smb.conf'u nereye koyuyosa oraya bakIn)...
smb.conf'dan alInma:
------ 8< ---- Cut here and ruin your monitor ---- 8< ------
; Domain Control Options
; OS Level gives Samba the power to rule the roost. Windows NT = 32
; Any value < 32 means NT wins as Master Browser, > 32 Samba gets it
; os level = 33
; specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser
; domain master = yes
; Use with care only if you have an NT server on your network that has been
; configured at install time to be a primary domain controller.
; domain controller = <NT-Domain-Controller-SMBName>
; Domain logon control can be a good thing! See [netlogon] share section below!
; domain logons = yes
; run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine)
; logon script = %m.bat
; run a specific logon batch file per username
; logon script = %u.bat
; Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section
; WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server
; the default is NO.
; wins support = yes
; WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client
; Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both
; wins server = w.x.y.z
; WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on behalf of a non
; WINS Client capable client, for this to work there must be at least one
; WINS Server on the network. The default is NO.
; wins proxy = yes
; Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons
; [netlogon]
; comment = Samba Network Logon Service
; path = /home/netlogon
; Case sensitivity breaks logon script processing!!!
; case sensitive = no
; guest ok = yes
; locking = no
; read only = yes
; browseable = yes ; say NO if you want to hide the NETLOGON share
; admin users = @wheel
------ 8< ---- Cut here and ruin your monitor ---- 8< ------
Kolay gelsin...
-Kutsal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Los Angeles judge ruled that "a citizen may snore with immunity
in his own home, even though he may be in possession of unusual and
exceptional ability in that particular field."
-------------------------------------------------------------------------