[Gelistirici] contrib svn 'si altındaki pisidepo ve 3rd_Party hakkında

[Eren Türkay]

I agree you, Rajeev.

In my opinion, devel/ playground/ and experimental/ is a good solution as
Rajeev said. Isn't it?

So users can understand repository system and use it easily. And we can
finish this discussion :)


01.12.2006 tarihinde Rajeev J Sebastian <rajeev.sebastian at gmail.com> yazmış:
>
> Hello Koray and all friends,
>
> I'm sorry for creating all this confusion, on my part. I think other
> pisidepo members are also carefully considering this confusion. But I
> think what we said has been grossly misunderstood. We did *not*
> advocate seperatism. We did *not* advocate 2 development teams. I
> think you should understand that.
>
> The original proposal was to merge 3rd_party and pisidepo. We said we
> did not want that, because we consider pisidepo repo to be stable, and
> that we consider 3rd party to consist of packages that may not be
> maintained or is maintained by persons who do not wish involvement in
> the community as such.
>
> In other words, pisidepo was supposed to be the team of people who are
> not core devels. *THATS ALL*. We did not mean, pisidepo is the team of
> 5 or 6 persons and that noone else can join it. In fact, even you are
> a pisidepo member, even if you are also a core devel, simply because
> you are a member of the community.
>
> Imagine RedHat and Fedora. Imagine there was no "Fedora distro" and
> instead Fedora group worked on RedHat OS directly. So, Fedora would be
> the external contributors group. There is no need or possibility of
> say "Bedora" or "SedHat" or some other group that comes and asks for
> seperate repo, since any other such group would by definition be in
> Fedora itself.
>
> There was also some discussion that contrib/ exists to put those
> packages that can not be placed into devel/. I dont know what that
> means, so I am going to ignore it.
>
> Did you read my latest message ? If you did, then I think I can dispel
> any notion that
> I or any pisidepo members have said about what you think is
> "seperatism". I gave a suggestion to :
>
> 1) remove contrib/ repo.
> 2) create experimental/ repo.
> 3) move contrib/pisidepo/ packages to devel/
> 4) move 3rd-party packages to playground/ or experimental/
> 5) if an author of a package is in devel/, playground/ or
> experimental/, then give him the privileges to maintain those packages
> in that repo
> 6) have a policy of taking packages from experimental/ to playground/
> to devel/ depending on the stability of the package. So experimental/
> would be freshly packaged software, playground is tested packages and
> devel would be the most stable packages.
>
> After all, what is the meaning of "contrib/" repo when all
> developers/contributors are part of the same development team, i.e.,
> core devels ?
>
>
>
> About double work, one pisidepo member has something to say on it. I
> hope he will comment on it soon.
>
>
> Finally, I humbly request the current core devels to please take some
> action on this, so that we can put this behind us. Of course, if you
> take some action, then there is no need for any discussions or
> proliferation of misunderstandings :)
>
> If there is a moderator for this list, I strongly request that this
> thread be closed. It is useless to have this conversation which is
> based on a misunderstanding, and especially because this is wasting
> the time of all the devels who are preparing for the weekly release
> and for 2007 RC. Without the OS, there is no community.
>
> Regards,
> Rajeev J Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> Gelistirici mailing list
> Gelistirici at uludag.org.tr
> http://liste.uludag.org.tr/mailman/listinfo/gelistirici
>
-------------- sonraki bölüm --------------
Bir HTML eklentisi temizlendi...
URL: <http://liste.pardus.org.tr/gelistirici/attachments/20061201/c05b96e4/attachment-0001.htm>