[Linux] /usr/include ve /usr//include: hangisi 'normal'?

---------

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: SULEYMAN AYDIN (saydin@anadolu.edu.tr)
Date: Thu 14 Apr 2005 - 10:19:41 EEST


iyi calismalar,

tumuyle 'raslanti' ile bilgisayarimda yeni bir sey oldugunu ogrendim.

"/usr/include/ "
"/usr//include/"

ve,
"~$ ls -al /usr/" ile gorulmuyor;
~$ ls /usr//include ile gorulebilen bir durum.

Normal mi? ayrica olmasi 'gerekli' midir?

Merak bu ya; "~# mv /usr//include/ /usr//filan/" yaptim.. sisteme zarar
vermis olmuyorumdur umarim..

Bu bahaneyle de saniyorum yeni birsey daha ogrenmekteyim.
Tecrubesi ve bilgisi olan paylasabilir mi?

saygilarimla,
suleyman
saydin@anadolu.edu.tr

bilgi 1:
sistem: slackware 10.1;
init 3 [startx ile X'e geciliyor].

bilgi 2: ls -al /usr//include/ | grep / sonucunu yaziyorum;
"
//include/:
.//include/FLAC:
.//include/FLAC++:
.//include/Magick++:
.//include/OggFLAC:
.//include/OggFLAC++:
.//include/SDL:
.//include/WINGs:
.//include/alsa:
.//include/alsa/sound:
.//include/ao:
.//include/apache:
.//include/apache/xml:
.//include/arpa:
.//include/asm-i386:
.//include/at-spi-1.0:
.//include/at-spi-1.0/cspi:
.//include/at-spi-1.0/libspi:
.//include/atalk:
.//include/atk-1.0:
.//include/atk-1.0/atk:
.//include/attr:
.//include/bits:
.//include/blkid:
"
_______________________________________________
Linux mailing list
Linux@liste.linux.org.tr
http://liste.linux.org.tr/mailman/listinfo/linux


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

---------

Bu arsiv hypermail 2.1.2 tarafindan uretilmistir.