Bu sayede program serbest dolasima giriyor. Ureticinin isim hakkini
korudugunuz surece uzerinde istediginiz degisikligi yapabiliyor, parayla
ya da parasiz satabiliyorsunuz.
Bu sayede gelistirmek istediginiz yazilimi bir sekilde 'acik artirmaya'
sunmus oluyorsunuz. Pastaheneye gidip bir pastanin tarifini almaniz mumkun
degil, ama yazilim piyasasinda daha mukemmeli ve birlikte proje uretmeyi
dusunenler icin bu yontem bicilmis kaftan.
Ozellikle okullarimiza bilgisayarin yogun olarak girmeye baslayacagi
1998 Eylul'unden itibaren ulkemizde sanal projelerde bir patlama
yasayacagimiz asikar. Boyle bir 'sanal proje arastirmalari' bolumunun
information technologies ya da benzeri bir fakulte altinda
kurulmasini beklerim.
Turkuaz Linux'un gelisimini yapanlarin pek cogu birbirlerinin yuzunu
daha once ya hic gormemis, ya da konferanslarda gormus kisiler. Buna
ragmen internet uzerinde mesafe kavrami yokoluyor, yogun bir gudulenme
icinde 'acik gelistirme' yapilabiliyor.
Bilgi herkesindir, evrenseldir, sinirlanamaz. Bunun icin Linux ve
GNU ornek bir modeldir ve bir atlama tahtasi olarak kullanilabilir.
Ucretsiz yazilimin onu gayet aciktir, onu destekleyelim.
Iyi calismalar,
Gorkem
> > Dört yıldır bilgisayarlarla uğraşıyorum. Linux sayesinde
> > ilk defa meselenin sosyal boyutunu da görmeye başladım.
> > Free Software kavramı başlı başına bir inceleme konusu.
> > Bu konuda İnternet üzerinde zengin sayılabilecek kaynaklar
> > var. Bu nedenle Linux tartışma gruplarının kendilerini
> > yalnızca teknik meselelerle sınırlı tutmamaları gerektiğini
> > düşünüyorum. Bu konuda rastladığınız "cool" makaleleri
> > lütfen gönderiniz.
> >
> > Benim karşıma çok çıkan ve "derin" tartışmalara yol açmış
> > The Cathedral and the Bazaar adlı makalenin ilk bölümünü
> > gönderiyorum. Dileyen gerisini şu adresten bulabilir:
> >
> > http://www.redhat.com/redhat/cathedral-bazaar/
> >
> > Yorumlarınızı bekliyorum.
> >
> > Sevgiler
> >
> > Gültekin Onan
> > ICQ No: 825 2680
> >
> > 1. The Cathedral and the Bazaar
> >
> > Linux is subversive. Who would have thought even five years ago
> > that a world-class operating system could coalesce as if by magic
> > out of part-time hacking by several thousand developers scattered
> > all over the planet, connected only by the tenuous strands of the
> > Internet?
> > Certainly not I. By the time Linux swam onto my radar screen in early
> > 1993,
> > I had already been involved in Unix and free-software development for
> > ten years. I was one of the first GNU contributors in the mid-1980s.
> > I had released a good deal of free software onto the net, developing or
> > co-developing several programs (nethack, Emacs VC and GUD modes, xlife,
> > and others) that are still in wide use today. I thought I knew how it
> > was done.
> >
> > Linux overturned much of what I thought I knew. I had been preaching
> > the Unix gospel of small tools, rapid prototyping and evolutionary
> > programming for years. But I also believed there was a certain critical
> > complexity above which a more centralized, a priori approach was
> > required.
> > I believed that the most important software (operating systems and
> > really
> > large tools like Emacs) needed to be built like cathedrals, carefully
> > crafted by individual wizards or small bands of mages working in
> > splendid
> > isolation, with no beta to be released before its time.
> > Linus Torvalds's style of development - release early and often,
> > delegate everything you can, be open to the point of promiscuity -
> > came as a surprise. No quiet, reverent cathedral-building here --
> > rather, the Linux community seemed to resemble a great babbling
> > bazaar of differing agendas and approaches (aptly symbolized by the
> > Linux archive sites, who'd take submissions from anyone) out of which
> > a coherent and stable system could seemingly emerge only by a succession
> > of miracles.
> >
> > The fact that this bazaar style seemed to work, and work well,
> > came as a distinct shock. As I learned my way around, I worked hard not
> > just at individual projects, but also at trying to understand why the
> > Linux world not only didn't fly apart in confusion but seemed to go from
> > strength to strength at a speed barely imaginable to cathedral-builders.
> > By mid-1996 I thought I was beginning to understand. Chance handed me a
> > perfect way to test my theory, in the form of a free-software project
> > which I could consciously try to run in the bazaar style. So I did --and
> > it was a significant success.
> >
> > In the rest of this article, I'll tell the story of that project,
> > and I'll use it to propose some aphorisms about effective free-software
> > development.
> > Not all of these are things I first learned in the Linux world, but
> > we'll see how the Linux world gives them particular point. If I'm
> > correct, they'll help you understand exactly what it is that makes the
> > Linux community such a fountain of good software -- and help you become
> > more productive yourself.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
>
>
>
>